GREAT MOVEMENTS

Sensorimotor Integration

/

Introduction

Sensorimotor integration is the process through which the nervous system integrates sensory data from various sources (e.g., visual, proprioceptive, vestibular) to plan, carry out, and refine motor actions. This dynamic interaction between sensory input and motor output is vital for coordinated movement, controlling posture, and engaging in functional activities.[1]For conditions involving impaired movement, balance, or coordination like stroke, parkinson’s disease, dystonia, and traumatic neck pain, an understanding of sensorimotor integration is essential for effective assessment and management.[2][3] [4]

Definition

Sensorimotor integration is the central nervous system’s (CNS) ability to process sensory inputs, including tactile, proprioceptive, visual, vestibular and auditory inputs, and use this information to generate coordinated and adaptive movements. This process involves complex interactions among sensory receptors, neural pathways, and motor systems, facilitating motor control, learning and environmental interaction.[5]

SMI involves multiple brain areas, including the primary somatosensory cortex (S1), the primary motor cortex (M1), the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), the cerebellum, and the basal ganglia, as well as spinal and subcortical pathways.[6][7]

Neurophysiological Basis

Sensorimotor integration relies on the dynamic interplay between sensory feedback and motor commands, facilitated by neural circuits that process and adapt to sensory information.

Main points include:

  • Efference copy and forward models: The CNS generates an efference copy  to compare with actual sensory feedback, enabling error correction and motor adaptation.
  • Internal Models: These are neural representations of the body’s state and environment, refined through experience to optimize movement control.
  • Multisensory Integration: SMI integrates inputs from multiple sensory modalities (e.g., vision, proprioception and vestibular) to reduce variance in localisation and enhance movement precision.
  • Cortical and subcortical contributions: The cerebellum, basal ganglia, and PPC are critical for processing sensory-motor transformations, while the spinal cord and brainstem mediate reflexive and automatic responses. [8][9][10][6]
https://youtube.com/watch?v=j10vbES7Q8w%3F

Clinical Relevance

Impairments in sensorimotor integration are common in conditions such as Stroke, Parkinson’s disease, cerebral palsy, dystonia, and traumatic neck pain, affecting movement, balance, and motor learning.

Stroke: Stroke disrupts SMI by damaging cortical regions or their white matter tracts, fundamentally impairing the dynamic interplay required for effective SMI. Goal-directed movements, such as reaching for a cup, demand precise coordination between planning (involving PPC and premotor areas), execution (M1), and continuous feedback processing (S1). When the connections within this critical M1-S1-PPC network are disrupted, the brain finds it difficult to:

  • Form accurate internal models of the body and environment.
  • Predict the sensory consequences of actions.
  • Effectively use real-time sensory feedback (proprioceptive, tactile, visual) for error correction and motor adaptation.
  • Translate visual information into appropriate motor commands for reaching and grasping

[11] [12][13] [14]

Parkinson’s Disease: While dopamine deficiency in the basal ganglia is the hallmark of PD, the resulting motor symptoms like bradykinesia and rigidity are profoundly influenced by disrupted SMI. PD patients find difficulty with:

  • Internal Cueing: Their ability to internally generate and scale movements is impaired, leading to reliance on less precise, often « noisy » proprioceptive and tactile feedback.
  • Sensory Perception Deficits: They exhibit reduced sensitivity to tactile stimuli, impaired proprioception and altered temporal processing. These deficits mean the brain receives inaccurate or insufficient sensory information to inform motor planning and execution.
  • Motor Modulation Issues: The disrupted basal ganglia-thalamocortical loops, which are critical for integrating sensory context to refine motor commands (e.g., scaling force, adjusting speed), malfunction. This leads to movements that are not properly modulated, appearing slow, stiff, and lacking amplitude.[15][16][17]

Cerebral Palsy: Children with cerebral palsy show sensory processing disorders, impacting motor control.  The non-progressive brain lesion in CP can affect various cortical and subcortical regions involved in sensorimotor integration, as well as the white matter tracts that connect them. This disruption impairs the brain’s ability to:

  • Filter and modulate sensory inputs.
  • Form and update accurate internal models.
  • Integrate multisensory information effectively.
  • Use sensory feedback for real-time error detection and correction.
  • Develop appropriate feedforward control mechanisms.

[18][19]

Dystonia: Altered sensory gating mechanisms in dystonia (e.g., cervical and focal hand dystonia) result in abnormal sensorimotor integration, with prolonged sensory tactile discrimination thresholds .[20][21]

Neck Pain: Sensorimotor impairments in neck pain, particularly traumatic cases, lead to dizziness, unsteadiness, and visual disturbances.[22]

Assessment of Sensorimotor Integration

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS): Several non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, like repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), are used to study how brain connections in the primary motor cortex change over time. They measure these changes by looking at long-term shifts in the strength of muscle responses (motor evoked potentials). 

[23][24]  [25]

Cervical Joint Position Error Test: Used in neck pain to assess proprioceptive deficits.[26]

Sensorimotor Tasks: Tasks like the Serial Reaction Time (SRT) task assess sequence learning and SMI, showing that abstract response sequences are encoded independently of stimuli.[27]

Applications of Sensorimotor Integration in Physiotherapy

Sensory-Enriched Interventions to enhance recovery: targeted sensory input to facilitate neuroplasticity and re-establish functional sensorimotor connections can help « retrain » the brain to better integrate sensations for motor control.[28][29]

Robot-Assisted and Virtual Reality Interventions :demonstrates the power of combining immersive visual environments with physical feedback for improved gait and balance in stroke.[30][31]

Mirror therapy: remains a widely used and researched intervention in stroke rehabilitation because this intervention provides sensory feedback manipulation.[32]

Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation: improve gait parameters (e.g., speed, stride length, cadence) and reduce freezing of gait in PD patients. Walking to a metronome or music enhances SMI by providing external sensory cues, reducing freezing of gait.[33]

Dual-Task Training: combining cognitive tasks (e.g., counting) with motor tasks (e.g., walking) strengthens sensorimotor coupling.[34]

Sensory Integration Therapy added to the conventional therapy program was significantly more effective in improving balance and increasing functional independence in children with spastic diplegic CP, « providing strong evidence for its direct impact on balance and motor function.[35][36]

References

  1.  Ruiz ML, Sarasa MR, Rodríguez LS, Benito-León J, Ristol EG, Arce SA. Current evidence on transcranial magnetic stimulation and its potential usefulness in post-stroke neurorehabilitation: Opening new doors to the treatment of cerebrovascular disease. Neurología (English Edition). 2018 Sep 1;33(7):459-72.[1]
  2.  Findlater SE, Mazerolle EL, Pike GB, Dukelow SP. Proprioception and motor performance after stroke: An examination of diffusion properties in sensory and motor pathways. Human Brain Mapping. 2019 Jul;40(10):2995-3009.[2]
  3.  Lewis GN, Byblow WD. Altered sensorimotor integration in Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2002 Sep 1;125(9):2089-99. [3]
  4.  Abbruzzese G, Marchese R, Buccolieri A, Gasparetto B, Trompetto C. Abnormalities of sensorimotor integration in focal dystonia: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Brain. 2001 Mar 1;124(3):537-45.[4]
  5.  Asan AS, McIntosh JR, Carmel JB. Targeting sensory and motor integration for recovery of movement after CNS injury. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2022 Jan 21;15:791824. [5]
  6.  Wang C, Yu Y, Yang J. Contributions of the Primary Sensorimotor Cortex and Posterior Parietal Cortex to Motor Learning and Transfer. Brain Sciences. 2024 Nov 26;14(12):1184. [6]
  7.  Matur Z, Öge AE. Sensorimotor integration during motor learning: transcranial magnetic stimulation studies. Archives of Neuropsychiatry. 2017 Dec;54(4):358. [7]
  8.  Franklin DW, Wolpert DM. Computational mechanisms of sensorimotor control. Neuron. 2011 Nov 3;72(3):425-42. [8]
  9.  Cullen KE. Vestibular processing during natural self-motion: implications for perception and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2019 Jun;20(6):346-63. [9]
  10.  Pei H, Wu Z, Ma L, Wang J, Li J, Geng X, Zou Y, Zhang M, Qi R, Yu H. Deep brain stimulation mechanisms in parkinson’s disease: immediate and long-term effects. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience. 2024 Jun 13;23(6):114. [10]
  11.  Bruyn ND, Bonkhoff AK, Saenen L, Thijs L, Essers B, Alaerts K, Verheyden G. Altered dynamic resting state functional connectivity associated with somatosensory impairments in the upper limb in the early sub-acute phase post-stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2023 Jul;37(7):423-33. [11]
  12.  Sahrizan NS, Yahya N, Law ZK, Wan Zaidi WA, Nabilah Ismail U, Afifah NH, Azri A, Abdul Manan H. A systematic review of alterations in sensorimotor networks following stroke: implications for integration and functional outcomes across recovery stages. Frontiers in Neurology. 2025 May 27;16:1456146. [12]
  13.  Pundik S, Skelly MM, McCabe JP, Salameh AI, Anderson T, Duncan KR, Hisel T, Carr SJ. Resting‐State Functional Connectivity of Sensorimotor and Default Mode Networks and Lower Limb Performance in Chronic Stroke: A Cross‐Sectional Study. Brain and Behavior. 2025 May;15(5):e70519. [13]
  14.  De Rooij IJ, Van De Port IG, Meijer JW. Effect of virtual reality training on balance and gait ability in patients with stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. Physical therapy. 2016 Dec 1;96(12):1905-18. [14]
  15.  Lewis GN, Byblow WD. Altered sensorimotor integration in Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2002 Sep 1;125(9):2089-99. [15]
  16.  Tamilselvam YK, Ganguly J, Jog MS, Patel RV. Sensorimotor Integration: A Review of Neural and Computational Models and the Impact of Parkinson’s Disease. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems. 2024 Dec 23. [16]
  17.  Permezel F, Alty J, Harding IH, Thyagarajan D. Brain networks involved in sensory perception in Parkinson’s disease: a scoping review. Brain Sciences. 2023 Nov 6;13(11):1552. [17]
  18.  Youssef AA, Eltohamy AM, Shokry KE, Sarhan EE, Barakat NE. Sensory processing abilities in relation to motor capabilities in children with different types of cerebral palsy. Fizjoterapia Polska. 2024 Jan 1(1). [18]
  19.  Erkek S, Çekmece Ç. Investigation of the relationship between sensory-processing skills and motor functions in children with cerebral palsy. Children. 2023 Oct 24;10(11):1723. [19]
  20.  Stamelou M, Edwards MJ, Hallett M, Bhatia KP. The non-motor syndrome of primary dystonia: clinical and pathophysiological implications. Brain. 2012 Jun 1;135(6):1668-81. [20]
  21.  Abbruzzese G, Marchese R, Buccolieri A, Gasparetto B, Trompetto C. Abnormalities of sensorimotor integration in focal dystonia: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Brain. 2001 Mar 1;124(3):537-45. 
  22.  Treleaven J. Dizziness, unsteadiness, visual disturbances, and sensorimotor control in traumatic neck pain. Journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. 2017 Jul;47(7):492-502. [21]
  23.  Suppa A, Asci F, Guerra A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a tool to induce and explore plasticity in humans. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. 2022 Jan 1;184:73-89. [22]
  24.  Moscatelli F, Messina A, Valenzano A, Monda V, Salerno M, Sessa F, La Torre E, Tafuri D, Scarinci A, Perrella M, Marsala G. Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a tool to investigate motor cortex excitability in sport. Brain Sciences. 2021 Mar 28;11(4):432. [23]
  25.  Matur Z, Öge AE. Sensorimotor integration during motor learning: transcranial magnetic stimulation studies. Archives of Neuropsychiatry. 2017 Dec;54(4):358. [24]
  26.  Moustafa IM, Ahbouch A, Zadeh SA, Shousha T, Oakley PA, Harrison D. Differences in sensorimotor integration, cervical sensorimotor control, and cognitive-motor dual tasking costs in chronic non-specific neck pain patients with high vs. low catastrophizing tendencies compared to healthy controls. Behavioural Brain Research. 2025 Mar 12;481:115434. [25]
  27.  Szewczyk M, Augustynowicz P, Szubielska M. Implicit spatial sequential learning facilitates attentional selection in covert visual search. An event-related potentials study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2022 Dec 1;16:974791. [26]
  28.  Yan W, Lin Y, Chen YF, Wang Y, Wang J, Zhang M. Enhancing neuroplasticity for post-stroke motor recovery: mechanisms, models, and neurotechnology. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 2025 Mar 18. [27]
  29.  Aman JE, Elangovan N, Yeh IL, Konczak J. The effectiveness of proprioceptive training for improving motor function: a systematic review. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2015 Jan 28;8:1075. [28]
  30.  Zhang B, Wong KP, Kang R, Fu S, Qin J, Xiao Q. Efficacy of robot-assisted and virtual reality interventions on balance, gait, and daily function in patients with stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2023 Oct 1;104(10):1711-9. [29]
  31.  Kim S, Lee Y, Kim K. Gait Training with Virtual Reality-Based Real-Time Feedback for Chronic Post-Stroke Patients: A Pilot Study. InHealthcare 2025 Jan 20 (Vol. 13, No. 2, p. 203). MDPI. [30]
  32.  Ramachandran VS, Altschuler EL. The use of visual feedback, in particular mirror visual feedback, in restoring brain function. Brain. 2009 Jul 1;132(7):1693-710. [31]
  33.  Ye X, Li L, He R, Jia Y, Poon W. Rhythmic auditory stimulation promotes gait recovery in Parkinson’s patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Neurology. 2022 Jul 28;13:940419. [32]
  34.  Li Z, Wang T, Liu H, Jiang Y, Wang Z, Zhuang J. Dual-task training on gait, motor symptoms, and balance in patients with Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical rehabilitation. 2020 Nov;34(11):1355-67. [33]
  35.  Turhan A, Yavuzer M. THE EFFECTS OF SENSORY INTEGRATION THERAPY AND CONVENTIONAL THERAPY PROGRAMME ON SPASTICITY, BALANCE AND MOTOR FUNCTION IN SPASTIC DIPLEGIC CEREBRAL PALSY. Selçuk Sağlık Dergisi. 2025;6(1):160-74. [34]
  36.  Mittal R, Dhiman S, Ahmed S, Sharma R, Khan MH, Ajmera P, Goyal RK, Gulati S. Impact of sensory-based therapy on problems with balance and posture in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Discover Public Health. 2024 Dec;21(1):1-3. [35]
https://www.physio-pedia.com/Sensorimotor_Integration

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *